Managing Contraception Questions and Answers
Questions & Answers
Everything you ever wanted to know about managing contraception and weren't afraid to ask.

Click here to ask a question
Search the Questions & Answers Browse by Category
<< Return to questions


At age 44 with a family history of ovarian cancer, was my doctor wise to start me on birth control pills? #102/10
I am wondering about my fertility/lack of fertility due to several factors: I had surgery 4 years ago- removed right ovary & tube, appendix, cysts, endomitriosis, tumor - which was found noncancerous. Due to that finding and my maternal history of ovarian cancer, my ObGyn has put me on birth control pills until I am at least 50 years old (I am now 44).

Without the the pills, how likely am I to get pregnant? Does my left ovary release an egg each month to make up for the missing right one? Will I still show signs of menepause the same way?

Does it make sense for me to take pills to prevent ovarian cancer since my mother had ovarian cancer?

Thank you,

The big question in my mind is, “Do you want to become pregnant?”  Please send me your answer to this.  If you do want to become pregnant it would be wise to start trying to become pregnant now!     


You have a smart doctor, a very smart doctor.  Pills have a dramatic protective effect against ovarian cancer. Encouraging you to use pills now makes great sense if you do NOT want to become pregnant.


Having just one ovary would not materially alter the number of cycles during which you ovulate or the perimenopause/menstrual transition for a woman who is NOT on pills.


However, taking pills will alter your periods and symptoms a great deal and for the most part prove to be beneficial.

You may want to continue low-dose  pills until the early to mid 50’s.

 

Here is some data from the 19th edition of Contraception Technology:

Combined Oral Contraceptives by Anita L. Nelson, MD

General Health Benefits

1.         Ovarian cancer risk reduction. Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic cancer because most of the 26,000 cases diagnosed each year in the United States are not detected until the women have advanced disease.[i][i] When compared with women who have never used COCs, COC users are 40% less likely to develop epithelial ovarian cancer. Ten years or more of use of monophasic formulations reduces a woman’s risk of developing such cancers by 80%.[ii][ii] This protection lasts for up to two decades beyond the time the woman takes her last COC.,[iii][iii] Some studies that focus on the newer lower-dose formulations (<35 mcg EE) have found that the lower-dose formulations protect as well as higher-dose formulations, but other studies report less protection with a lower dose of progestins.[iv][iv]

A compelling argument can be made that COCs can be used to prevent cancer in high-risk women even if they do not need contraception. Women with a family history of ovarian cancer enjoy a greater benefit of ovarian cancer risk reduction than do women with no family history. Women with first-degree relatives with ovarian cancer who used COCs for 4 years had a 90% reduction in ovarian cancer risk. Most studies have found that women with BRCA1 mutations have similar protection from ovarian cancer with COC use,  although one study found that in­creased duration of COC use did not reduce further the risk of ovarian cancer in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers and cau­tioned against routine use of COCs for chemoprevention. Longer term experience will be needed to resolve this issue.

2.         Endometrial cancer risk reduction. COC use for at least 12 months reduces a woman’s risk of devel­oping endometrial cancer by about 40%. In women who use COCs for at least a decade, the risk of developing endometrial cancer is only one fifth of that of non-pill users (an 80% reduction). The protection that pills offer against endometrial cancer protection also endures for up to 20 years after COC discontinuation. This feature is particularly important in women who have risk factors for developing endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma, such as anovulatory cycling due to PCOS or obesity. The incidence of endometrial cancer is increasing in the United States because of an increasing lifespan among women and an epidemic of obesity. Over 40,000 women develop this cancer each year. Women who are 50 pounds or more overweight have almost a 10-fold increased risk of developing endometrial cancer compared to normal weight controls.

You are doing great!  Happy New Year!


Now, February 2, Did you recieve my first response and what did you decide to do about birth control pills?
  

Key words:  fertility, surgery, ovary, tube, appendix, cysts, endometriosis, tumor, non-cancerous, ovarian cancer, birth control pills, pregnant, menopause, dramatic protection, Contraceptive Technology, Dr. Anita L. Nelson, risk reduction

 

Reference:

Nelson AL. Combined oral contraceptives IN Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Cates Jr. W, Stewart F. et al Contraceptive Technology 19th edition, pages 204 and 205: Ardent Media Inc. 2008


[i][i].       Vessey MP, Painter R. Endometrial and ovarian cancer and oral contraceptives--findings in a large cohort study. Br J Cancer 1995;71(6):1340-1342.

[ii][ii].      Rosenberg L, Palmer JR, Zauber AG, Warshauer ME, et al. A case-control study of oral contraceptive use and invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1994;139(7):654-661.

[iii][iii].    Ness RB, Grisso JA, Klapper J, Schlesselman JJ, et al. Risk of ovarian cancer in relation to estrogen and progestin dose and use characteristics of oral contracep­tives. SHARE Study Group. Steroid Hormones and Reproductions. Am J Epidemiol 2000;152(3):233-241.

[iv][iv].    Schildkraut JM, Calingaert B, Marchbanks PA, Moorman PG, Rodriguez GC. Im­pact of progestin and estrogen potency in oral contraceptives on ovarian cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94(1):32-38.

[v][v].     Jensen JT, Speroff L. Health benefits of oral contraceptives. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2000;27(4):705-721.

[vi][vi].    Gross TP, Schlesselman JJ. The estimated effect of oral contraceptive use on the cumulative risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83(3):419-424.

[vii][vii].  Walker GR, Schlesselman JJ, Ness RB. Family history of cancer, oral contraceptive use, and ovarian cancer risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186(1):8-14.

[viii][viii]. Narod SA, Risch H, Moslehi R, Dorum A, et al. Oral contraceptives and the risk of hereditary ovarian cancer. Hereditary Ovarian Cancer Clinical Study Group. N Engl J Med 1998;339(7):424-428.

[ix][ix].    Modan B, Hartge P, Hirsh-Yechezkel G, Chetrit A, et al; National Israel Ovarian Cancer Study Group. Parity, oral contraceptives, and the risk of ovarian cancer among carriers and noncarriers of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med 2001;345(4):235-240.

[x][x].     Combination oral contraceptive use and the risk of endometrial cancer. The Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study of the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. JAMA 1987;257(6):796-800.

[xi][xi].    Schlesselman JJ. Risk of endometrial cancer in relation to use of combined oral contraceptives. A practitioner’s guide to meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 1997;12(9):1851-1863.


Posted 1-5-2010, Updated 1-14-2010, Updated 1-19-2010, Updated 2-2-2010 
Robert A. Hatcher MD, MPH
Professor of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Emory University School of Medicine
Atlanta, GA
---2010-02-3


A Pocket Guide to Managing Contraception ISBN 978-0-9794395-0-6 #8005
  


Contraceptive Technology 19th Edition ISBN 9781597080019 #7019
  

The directors and owners of this website and any publications and information concerning health matters offered here advise a person with a particular problem to consult a primary-care clinician or a specialist in obstetrics, gynecology, or urology (depending on the problem or the contraceptive) as well as the product package insert and other references before diagnosing, managing, or treating the problem.
Visitor Comments
No visitor comments posted.

Post a comment
Post Comment
To post a comment for this question, simply complete the form below. Fields marked with an asterisk are required.
   Your Name:
   Email Address:
* Your Comment:
* Enter the code below:
 
Related Questions
No related questions were found.
Attachments
No attachments were found.

Suggestions, recommendations, questions, comments, data from the literature, interpretation of laboratory tests and other information provided on this site are for informational purposes only and are not intended to be relied upon as advice from or implied to be a substitute for the professional advice of a physician, nurse practitioner, nurse midwife, counselor or other healthcare professional. Always seek the advice of your clinician or other professional for any questions you may have regarding your health, medical condition, method of birth control and other family planning or personal/social issues. Periodic references to costs of birth control methods on this website are estimates only and your actual cost for any specific method of birth control may be more or less than the stated amount. Emory University School of Medicine, Bridging the Gap Foundation, and Bridging the Gap Communications Inc are not responsible for any damage or loss you may incur as a result of your use of or reliance on any material or information provided through this website.